SOUNDSTAGE! ON HIFIAsk Wes Archives

June 1 to June 9, 2000

 

June 9, 2000

Subject: System matching

Sweden calling...

Hi Wes! Because English is not "my" language, I have to warn you for what might not be correctly spelled -- or other grammatical nonsense. I hope that I'm not disturbing you either, but since you have your own mailing address, it seems that you have an open communication line, even to Sweden.

OK, I wish you could, very briefly, give me  good "system advice." I guess it is quite hopeless to transform opinion from one system to another, and overall I don't think it's fair to give an expert that responsibility. At the same, I must admit that I eat every inkspot in your columns, trying to imaging what my opinion would have been.

I normally use music listening as a "soul-cleaner." With one wife, four children, a red cat and a turtle from Greece, I think I sometimes have the right to use our sofa for late-night listening. Since I have no special favorite music style or artist, my only concern is to have the performances as close to live as it can get, presented in the room. These moments can still put me in such a mood; it feels like a good, smooth, mental free fall into a black hole. (When I awake, I’m sure a funny smile can be seen on my face.) Back in reality, I'm sure my wife has a better, kinder and more pleased husband (the turtle has no comments to that).

My system today contains:

  • Quad 77 integrated amp and CD player
  • Totem Model 1 loudspeakers,
  • Cogan-Hall Intermezzo cables.

The Quad system will be replaced, and I also want to update the Totems to the Signature model. I have no intentions to have sources inputs other than the CD player and will therefore have a very straight combination, pure and simple. This is what I have looked at:

  • Wadia 830 CD player (running directly into the power amp)
  • Simaudio Moon I-5 integrated amplifier
  • Simaudio Celeste 4050SE amplifier
  • Audion Silver Night 300B amplifier
  • Bryston 4B-ST amplifier
  • Pathos Twin Tower integrated amplifier
  • Pathos INPower amplifier
  • Quad II Forty amplifier
  • Lavardin AP amplifier
  • Lavardin IS integrated amplifier

OK, value-for-the-money (so they say), what's your opinion and advice?

PS: Today weather conditions here in Scandinavia is dry and hot. Summer is just around the corner, and tonight my wife is having a combination of outdoor barrel-bath and barbecue. Her working colleagues at the hospital are having a retreat or something. The cat is screaming for food and the children’s homework comes next.

Janne

Dear Janne:

Thanks for sending me a letter that talks about the importance of music and its "soul-cleaning" properties. I can certainly relate to that! And your letter reminds all of us that our hi-fis aren’t the only important things in our lives -- we all have wives, children, cats, and even turtles that share our attention and emotions. (And, I have to add, if my wife were in the backyard fixing to have a barrel bath/barbecue, I sure wouldn’t be indoors at the computer!)

But your letter also illustrates how hard it is to give system advice by e-mail. While I have played with the Wadia 830 and found it a remarkable CD player, I have varying degrees of experience with the amplifiers on your list. I’ve heard the Lavardins, Audion, and Pathos amps only for short periods at hi-fi shows (and they all impressed me in that context), while I have had hands-on experience with Simaudio and Bryston (also impressive, but oh-so-different!).

And here’s what makes it even harder, I don’t know the Swedish market at all, so I have no idea what any of these products costs there -- and that means I can’t comment at all about bang-for-the-buck (or is that kick for the kroner?).

So I can’t say much in response to your question, other than those all look like good choices for good-sounding systems. However, there’s such a wide range of amps, from SE monoblocks to M. Lavardin’s radical solid-state gear, that there’s also a wide range of sonic possibilities -- surely not every one of them could be to your liking. So listen carefully -- and remember to enjoy the journey. You’ll have a much better time of it that way.

ATB...Wes


June 6, 2000

Subject: To bi-amp or not to...

It's good to see your byline again! I suspect that my question is one that gets asked a lot, but here goes: I am into the second year of my "new" system, which took many months of reading reviews, auditioning components, and finally forking over the cash to put together. The final nudge came in the form of a very positive review by your compatriot, Bob Harley, for the Simaudio I-5 integrated amp. I coupled this with a Theta Miles and Totem Tabu speakers to make a very satisfying system.

So where's the problem? Well, as in most things, it takes time for the flaws to reveal themselves after the first blush of love is past. Specifically, in large-scale orchestral works (say one of your favorites: Mahler's Third Symphony) the sound can start to congest. Play a recording like Alfred Brendel's Schubert D960 and he is sitting in the room with you -- wow. So with all that said, is there a valid reason to suspect that adding a second I-5, and either vertically or horizontally bi-amping, would relieve the "congestion" found on some large-scale works (played at concert levels)? Or would I be better served by one of the more powerful amps in place of the I-5? Understand that my budget will not stretch for the likes of say an ARC VT-200, let alone an ARC VT-100.

Regards,

David W. Hoffman

Dear David:

While some audiophiles deny that "passive" bi-amping (using several amplifiers with the existing crossover for your loudspeakers) has any effect, I have found that it can give you greater control over a speaker’s individual drivers. One way to test your setup to see if you’ll derive any benefit from this type of bi-amplification is to think mono. Find a monaural recording of a big symphony and listen to it through one loudspeaker as you have them set up now -- don’t get musically involved now, you’re listening for problems! Now take a Y-adaptor and feed a single channel's signal through both halves of your amp and listen again with one channel driving the highs and the other driving the lows.

If you hear improvements, and I suspect you will, you’ll probably be satisfied with picking up another Simaudio amp of equal power. If you don’t hear improvements where you want ‘em, you should probably think about going to a single, more powerful stereo amp. I’m not a huge fan of passively bi-amping with amps of different power outputs because I’ve never been able to get it to sound right. YMMV.

And one more thing: Everybody talks about how much power is freed up when you no longer have to drive the bass -- well, it works the other way, too. It takes a lot of power to drive the complex midrange/tweeter signal. So much so on some loudspeakers that the counter-intuitive maneuver of putting the more powerful amp on top might actually be more successful.

ATB...Wes


June 3, 2000

Subject: Preamps: naked without remote?

By how much, if at all, will a fine preamp with a remote, such as the Placette Audio Line-Stage Preamp and Remote Volume Control fall short of the performance of equivalent preamplifiers by Lamm, CAT, etc. which proudly forsake remotes?

Charlie Houston

Dear Charlie:

Not one jot. Most remote-controlled preamps today utilize either microprocessor-controlled relays linked to a network of low-noise metal-foil resistors or motorized pots to make loudness and balance remote controllable. Neither method has an adverse effect on the audio signal, unlike some of the cruder attenuators of yesteryear.

The best-sounding preamps I’ve used (CJ ART, Mark Levinson No. 32, Ayre K-1) have all included remote control, as did the Lamm L1 preamp I reviewed in Stereophile several years ago.

I think the age of the "hairshirt audiophile" -- that is, the audiophile who proudly avoided convenience -- is over. These days, since there's no sonic downside to having a remote control, there's no reason to avoid it.

ATB...Wes


June 2, 2000

Subject: VTL TT-25 review

After reading your review, and one in the latest TAS, I'm very interested in these TT-25s. However, I can't seem to find any VTL dealers, and VTL hasn't answered my email. (The website hasn't been updated in nearly three years, so I wonder whether they care about the 'net presence.)

I did find a couple of people selling used TT-25s, but one comment in your review makes me cautious. You say that the current TT-25 is an improved model. Do you have any more information to offer? Has there been revisions to the TT-25 or were you referring to the TT-25 as being an improvement on previous Tiny Triodes in the line?

Thanks,

Michael

Dear Michael:

I’m surprised you haven’t been able to get in touch with VTL -- I’ve always found them responsive, even when I sold gear and that meant I was calling with a problem. I meant that the TT-25 was an improved version of the Tiny Triode amp originally reviewed by Corey Greenberg and Sam Tellig way back when. I am not aware of any revisions to the TT-25.

ATB...Wes


June 1, 2000

Subject: Audio system

I am planning to separate my system in two -- one for audio, the other for audio/video. The audio system will be minimalist. It will only have a CD player and turntable and two amps. I have found an amp (AudioSource Amp Two) that allows direct connection; it has provision for both CD and preamp inputs. The problem is that you can't connect both the CD player and record player at the same time. I don't intend to play both at the same time.

My question is, what would happen if I were to plug both machine at the same time? Could it be a fire hazard? Or, should I bite the bullet and get a preamp? Any info you can provide will be appreciated.

Sincerely,

Jude Maignan

Dear Jude:

I doubt you’d run a fire hazard plugging both a phono section and a CD player in at the same time (through a Y-adaptor, I assume?). But such an unbuffered setup could load down whichever source you were playing with fairly audible (and really yucky) sonic results. If you don’t want to go the preamp route, try to find a reasonably high-quality switching box, such as the ones Dean Roumanis used to make before joining Krell. Those were extremely high-quality units and I don’t know of anyone producing anything like them today.

ATB...Wes


SOUNDSTAGE! ON HIFIAll Contents Copyright © 2000
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.