December 31, 2002
Subject: SACD/DVD-A
Dear Wes,
It was nice reading your site. I use to spend my lunch
break in high school in the library reading hi-fi mags, usually when I had made some bully
mad at me. In college, I also kept reading the mags. I started collecting stereo gear at
13 years old.
I, like you, have bought hi-fi gear (the good stuff) in the
past but now as a father that gear is out of reach. I still have my Altec Studio monitors,
which were re-coned by Altec Lansing eight years ago.
I just bought a DVD player that plays SACD. I have not
found many sites with SACD or DVD-Audio available. I call myself a music junkie. I always
need music playing. My problem is I know what a good system sounds like.
Amusingly enough, I buy electronic gear for the broadcast
facility I work for, so I actually get to purchase audio gear often, only it's
broadcast-quality, which means it's heavy duty and is marked up twice.
Clark Julian
I really like SACD a lot, but there's a complete absence of
demand for it on the part of non-audiophiles, so I suspect it will either disappear or
languish without much of a following. I like DVD-Video, too -- especially for its vast
catalog of available titles. DVD-Audio is a different matter entirely. I've liked the
24-bit/96kHz discs I've heard from Classic and Chesky, but they utilize the legacy 24/96
channels in the video DVD standard. DVD-A, on the other hand, is all over the map in sound
quality, at least from what I've heard.
But I'm the guy who predicted that CD was too
"complicated" to catch on, so my prognostication record is abysmal.
December 28, 2002
Subject: Subwoofer addition
Hello Wes,
I thoroughly enjoyed your review of
the Dayton Loudspeakers 10" Titanic subwoofer and have begun to think that it
might be a good addition for me.
I am presently using Paradigm Studio/20s, running through a
Musical Fidelity XA-1 integrated (which is excellent). The bass from the Studio/20s is
quite good considering their small size, but I'm curious if you think a subwoofer like the
Titanic would be a positive addition to my system.
If you have any thoughts on this, I would really appreciate
your comments.
Grant Warrens
Like everything else, the answer all depends.... The Dayton
Subwoofer will take some of the strain off the Studios/20s, which will make them sound
even more open and glorious in the midrange -- as well as take some of the strain off the
Musical Fidelity.
The trick is integrating the sub in your room so it
integrates with the speakers, which is hard. In fact, I have a theory that it is actually
impossible and that the few subwoofers which have been set up properly might simply
be statistical anomalies.
OK, maybe not. But tuning in a sub to seamlessly meld with
a pair of good-sounding speakers is really, really difficult -- and frustrating,
too, at least until you get it working just right.
December 24, 2002
Subject: Amp choices
Wes,
Recently one of my ARC VT-150 SEs self-immolated and is
basically unrepairable. I have been on a quest for a replacement for the ARC monoblocks
and would really appreciate your thoughts on some possible replacements. I have a Hovland
preamp and listen to records on my Oracle/Graham/Helikon system.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Kevin Fitzpatrick
You don't mention your speakers or your budget, but I'll
give it a stab anyway -- in the most general way, of course. I simply loved the
Cary CAD-808 ($3995/each -- it's a stereo amp, but two of 'em make a great pair of dual
monoblocks for driving biwired speakers). The "Rocket 88s" (as Cary's Dennis Had
calls 'em) offer a choice between ultralinear operation (40Wpc) and triode (20Wpc) and can
be configured however you like 'em best -- like, say, ultralinear for the woofers and
triode for the mids/tweeters.
I have also been extremely impressed with the latest
batch of products coming out of VTL -- they look great and sound even better.
December 19, 2002
Subject: Krell or Plinius?
Hi Wes,
I am glad to have found you again! It has been a long time
since I read your articles in Stereophile. I have a simple question to ask. I am
considering the purchase of a Krell FPB-300c or a Plinius SA-250 Mk IV amp. My speakers
are the Eggleston Andras. My preamp is (for the moment) a Chiro C-800 preamp/processor. I
am a bit concerned regarding the Krell's CAST system. I will not be using it for now. Will
the amp sound bad because of a SE-to-balanced interconnect I will have to use?
Have you listened to the Plinius amp? Opinions regarding
these two products are widely different! Can you help me with your insights on them? I
would really appreciate your feelings about these two units.
Best regards,
Gerry Maroulis
Don't give the CAST "problem" a thought -- it's
basically an extra for people who have complete CAST systems. (And if you do have a
complete CAST-capable system, I strongly recommend you run it with the CAST interconnects
-- it's one heck of an extra.) However, the CAST components still offer fantastic
performance single-ended or balanced -- the FPB-300c is a great amp however you run it.
The Plinius is also a very fine-sounding amp, but I haven't
spent any time with it in my system, so I couldn't possibly compare the two.
However, I'd say the two should make an interesting contrast -- and that whichever you
chose would sound kickin' with your Andras.
December 16, 2002
Subject: New speakers
Dear Wes,
Thanks for all of the useful and practical information you
provide on your site. I am the proud owner of a Classé CAP-151 integrated amplifier. My
source is a Musical Fidelity upsampling DAC with my old Cambridge Audio 500SE CD player
acting as a transport. Can you recommend a pair of speakers for my rather kludgey rig. I
listen to jazz and classical and live in a typical pre-war NY apartment -- it's small and
has wood floors and high ceilings. Many thanks.
Heath
You don't give a price range, so I'll take a guess from the
rest of your gear and assume that your looking for a fairly good pair of speakers that
offers unusually good sound for the money -- and since you live in a NYC apartment, I'll
assume you're looking for something that isn't huge. That's an awfully good description of
the Epos M15, which is just shy of $1400/pair. Since it's a floorstanding mini-tower, you
won't need stands, which is a nice bonus.
The Dynaudio Contour 1.3 mk IIs offer a little more of
everything, but are still NYC apartment-sized. They cost $2399/pair and do require
stands, but they have looks that match their sound -- both are world-class.
And finally, an off-the-wall notion (also off-the-floor):
the Thiel PowerPoints, which can be mounted on your ceiling (probably the only unused
space in most NYC apartments). They cost $2600/pair and people tend to think of them as
home-theater speakers, but they sound fantastic (and enveloping) with music -- and all
that clear floor space is a huge bonus.
December 9, 2002
Subject: Ayre quality
Hi Wes,
Loved the piece on the
Ayre V-5x amp. You got me pretty excited. A few questions if I may:
(1) It sounds like Ayre stopped making the V-3 because it
was too expensive and the V-5 was a cost-cutting effort. Do you know if the V-5x
outperforms the V-3?
(2) I like the cosmetic look of the V-5x, but I may be
interested in their flagship amp. Any idea if you can get that amp in the "new
look?"
(3) Any plans on reviewing the CD player?
Thanks,
Mike
I apologize to both you and Charlie Hanson if I gave the
impression that the V-5 jettisoned the choke solely as a cost-cutting measure. It did add
considerably to the expense of the V-3, but there were other factors that led to Ayre's
decision to retire that amp, including parts availability and Charlie's desire to take
another crack at designing an amp in the $4000 price range, using some of the things he
and Gary Mulder had learned over the last three years of active development.
I am always suspicious of long-term memories when it comes
to sound, so it would be hypocritical for me to say the V-5x outperforms the V-3 since I
haven't heard a V-3 in about five years. However, the V-5x produces music that, in many
ways, sounds remarkably more like the real thing than just about any other power amplifier
I have heard (with the exception of the $9000 Linn Klimax Twin).
On the other hand, I also like MP3 (for what it is), so
draw your own conclusions.
I hope to get my mitts on a CD player shortly after CES in
January.
Hope this helps.
December 6, 2002
Subject: Magnum Dynalab MD 208
Hi Wes,
On August 21, 2000, in an answer to a questioner, you
wrote:
"Another likely candidate is Magnum Dynalab's MD 208,
which is actually a receiver, albeit a really special one from all reports. (I'll be
reviewing that one shortly, so be sure to watch for it.)"
Are you still going to review the MD 208?
MJ
I sure want to, and I've requested a product loan, which I
was told would be sent. Obviously I need to follow up on that request, but in the interim
I will be getting a Perreaux 200i in the immediate future, which is also an exciting
receiver.
Stay tuned.
December 2, 2002
Subject: System help
Wes,
I am about to acquire a pair of Bottlehead's Straight-8 kit
speakers and assemble them at home. I have a spare Rotel RB-985 five-channel amplifier. I
am unsure of the issue if I decide to keep the Rotel as the power amplifier and use a
preamp from Bottlehead, and with this arrangement if I would biwire from the power amp to
the main speakers. Do you think I should discard using the Rotel and use a pair of tube
monoblocks (either a pair of Bottlehead's Paramours or pair of Zens from Decware)?
I don't have a CD player, but when I do, I'll make sure I
get a transport and DAC to play the CDs, sending the signal to the monoblocks or preamp,
then Rotel.
Can you help and clarify my decisions?
Craig
I'm not sure I understand what "the issue" you
refer to is, but I'll try to answer the question I think you're asking. I went to
Bottlehead's website and the Straight 8 is a $599 kit-built 49"-tall tower
loudspeaker with eight 5" coated-aluminum drivers and a 1" titanium-dome
tweeter, crossed over by a first-order network. The kit appears to be innards only, with
you supplying the carpentry and MDF for the cabinet. It is extremely efficient (96dB) --
the site says it is suitable for use with amps using the 2A3 output tube (around 2 3W). I
haven't heard the speaker, so I can't comment on it -- although that tweeter looks kind of
high to me (which might well mean nothing if the crossover fixes its apparent focus
downward).
One observation I can make is that a speaker's (or any
other audio component's) design is one thing, but the degree of polish and detail-oriented
application it receives can make a good product have great sound or make a great product
sound merely OK. What these speakers actually will sound like will be a direct result of
how well you construct them. The better you are as a cabinet-maker, the better they'll
perform.
Of course, nothing comes close to the pride of having made
something yourself and the whole project, from dreaming to building to listening can be
infinitely more involving than simply purchasing a pair of speakers. I don't want to
discourage anyone from DIY, but you should always be realistic about your abilities.
The Rotel RB-985 is a five-channel amplifier putting out
100Wpc, which seems like a lot more than the Straight 8s should ever require -- and with
five channels, you could use the Rotel to biamplify the Straight 8s and still have an
unused channel. You've got the Rotel already, so you should use it, so what if it doesn t
sound like the ideal amp for those speakers.
Certainly, the amps and preamp offered by Bottlehead would
seem to be ideal mates for the speakers, and the website promises the kits are easy to
build, but I haven't heard any Bottlehead products and simply can't say one way or
another.
As to the issue of whether to get a single-box CD player or
go for separates, it's not at all as simple as: one-chassis CD players, bad;
separates, good. There are plusses and minuses for both choices. True, separates
give you flexibility, but they tend to cost more, you certainly need to add a digital
interconnect, and jitter usually rears its ugly head and must be dealt with one way or
another. (That's assuming you believe in jitter; if you don't believe in it, it
still rears its ugly head, but you get a philosophical pass from feeling you have to do
anything about it.) Some of the best-sounding CD playback systems I've ever heard have
been single-chassis affairs (including my current reference Musical Fidelity Nu-Vista 3D
CD).
Forgive me if I'm being presumptuous here, since this
doesn't answer any question you actually asked, but your question sounds as though you've
done a lot of reading and dreaming -- which is something all audiophiles like to do. But
one of the most certain ways to have fun with this hobby is to listen to everything you
can get your hands on (including friends' systems -- especially friends' systems,
since that's cheap if not free) and discover for yourself what you like and don't like.
Constructing a system completely from pieces you've never heard is a sure path to
disappointment, no matter how good someone else thinks each individual component is.
Hope you put together a system that makes you very happy.
|