January 31, 2003
Subject: MartinLogan
Hi Wes,
I have a very simple question. I am considering buying a
pair of loudspeakers and have narrowed it down to the MartinLogan Aeons or the B&W
CDM9NTs. While I like the clarity of the Aeons, I have been told that it is difficult --
and expensive -- to match them to components and other speakers for use in home theater.
Do you have any thoughts or suggestions to help me with this decision?
Thanks,
Chris
Your friends are correct that electrostatic loudspeakers do
generally represent a challenging load for an amplifier, especially multichannel A/V
receivers. If you are attempting to pair the MLs with a $500 A/V receiver, neither speaker
nor receiver is likely to be happy.
But MartinLogan has gone a long way towards making
electrostatic speakers user-friendly and I suspect that even multichannel receivers can
drive the Aeon, as long as they are rated for 4-ohm loads. Be sure to audition the combo
before buying, as always.
As for matching the Aeons to a center-channel -- well, that
probably will be difficult unless you go for ML's own center-channel. Personally, I think
that matching the front three speakers closely is essential and I'm very much in favor of
buying all three from the same manufacturer as long as they do seamlessly create a
soundscape.
I think that the surrounds are less critical in many
respects and, in fact, have a real fondness for Axiom's QS8 "quadpole"
surrounds, which strike me as a lot of surround for the money.
January 27, 2003
Subject: HDCD
Wes,
Currently I am using a Rotel 955 five-disc player. This
player is HDCD compatible, and I can hear distinct improvement when listening to HDCDs. I
am in the process of upgrading to a higher-quality single-disc player. I have been looking
at the Musical Fidelity 3.2 and Rega Jupiter, among others.
One thing I have not seen with these higher-end players is
HDCD compatibility. Is there a reason why higher-end players eschew this functionality?
Are there players in the $1000 to $2000 range that are HDCD compatible? Any insight would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ethan
I can think only think of three off-hand -- the Adcom
GCD-750, the Perreaux Reference Pro CD1P, and the Shanling CD-T100 -- but you're right,
there isn't a whole lot of attention being paid to HDCD these days. I think that's mostly
because people are so busy anticipating the next format (SACD, DVD-A, or something else)
that HDCD has gotten short shrift.
There are, of course, many, many HDCD recordings available
-- including many that are not identified as such. Since record labels are required to pay
a licensing fee for using the HDCD logo on their compact discs, many choose not to display
it. However, many mastering engineers prefer using the Pacific Microsonics mastering
suite, so it has become a de facto standard, especially in Nashville (this is why
so many uncredited country recordings activate the HDCD flag on your player).
The single finest CD player I have ever auditioned (Linn's
Sondek CD-12) used an HDCD chip, so it's not as though the technology has been discredited
or abandoned; it just isn't the current flavor of the month.
The Adcom, Perreaux, and Shanling would make great starting
places for your search for a better player.
January 23, 2003
Subject: Stylus wear
Dear Wes,
Is it possible to damage a stylus by playing LPs that are
in poor condition? Seeing how the stylus is diamond and the LP is vinyl, it must be pretty
hard to damage the stylus, though we are taking about a high pound-per-square-inch
situation. Is it really the vinyl that wears the stylus or the dust and dirt in the
groove?
Richard Leickly
It is possible to damage a stylus playing a badly
gouged record, but it would have to be a record with yawning chasms carved into the vinyl
and the stylus would have to be traveling sideways across the record's surface -- an
unlikely, but far from impossible, combination of events.
A completely blocked groove could also create the kind if
torque that skews styli, but that's another rarity.
Under normal circumstances, however, when a stylus is
tracking a groove in the direction it was designed to (not scratching or slip-cuing), it's
pretty difficult to harm it.
Over time, the vinyl, the dirt, and the pressure,
contribute to stylus wear, cantilever fatigue, and loss of suspension motility -- after
all, air and water are softer than rock, but they still managed to create the Grand
Canyon.
January 21, 2003
Subject: Tubes?
Wes,
I own a Rotel RB-1080, which I use to drive a pair of
Dynaudio Audience 82s. I want a preamp that will sound better than the preamp on my Yamaha
RXV870 receiver. I use a B&K PT3 in my system at work. I am considering matching the
amp with its stablemate, the RC-1070. However, I wonder if a tube preamp would couple well
with it. I considered a Conrad-Johnson PV12 ($800 used), but no remote.
Did I pick the right amplifier? Is there a better amp and
preamp combo that you could recommend under $2k?
Thank you,
Geoff Gaites
Well, one advantage to the PT3 you have, of course, is that
it has a pretty nifty tuner built in -- and it also sounds pretty darn good, too. But I'm
an audiophile too, and I realize there's not much excitement in buying a second copy of a
preamp you already have when the future holds endless possibilities. The Rotel preamp
probably is tainted by that same familiarity, although it too is a solid performer.
So by all means, take the plunge into tubes. A unit like
the PV12 would sound fabulous with your RB-1080, assuming you have the right temperament
for tubes.
Only you can judge whether or not you can be happy owning
tubes. The secret to being happy with tubes lies in trusting your ears more than the
"common knowledge" of measurement-obsessed audiophiles. They're right, in some
ways -- tubes exhibit horrible amounts of measured distortion compared to modern
solid-state equipment. However, many listeners believe that tubed gear, no matter what the
measurements say, also captures some essential components of live music that seem to elude
solid-state gear.
To paraphrase the old joke, "Who are you going to
believe the measurements or your ears?"
However, even if you do prefer the sound of tubes,
you may not want to own them. Tube components have become extremely reliable over
the years, but the fact remains that you need to replace tubes and that means you
have to find replacement tubes.
How you react to that knowledge will pretty much determine
whether or not you should own tubes. Some people react to this as comfortably as knowing
that their light bulbs burn out and need to be replaced, but others obsess over tube life,
imagining that the sound is deteriorating by the second. Others go nuts exploring the
wonderful world of "tube rolling" -- comparing the same tube made by different
manufacturers or similar tubes.
Nothing wrong with that, of course, as long as it's fun,
but if it drives you nuts never knowing that you have achieved, and will continue to
experience, the "tight" sound, tubes aren't for you.
January 14, 2003
Subject: New amplifier
Hi Wes,
You have a great website. I recently bought a Musical
Fidelity A3 CD player and Dynaudio Contour 1.1 speakers, not independently from your
positive reviews on these brands. They are really terrific. Through these components I am
really rediscovering my CDs. I am considering buying a new amplifier instead of an old NAD
3224. I could buy a Musical Fidelity trio with 50 watts, or a Densen Beat 100 integrated.
What do you think -- which would fit better for my existing components? Does the MF combo
have sufficient power to drive the Dynaudio loudspeakers?
Andras Toth
I haven't spent a lot of time with the Densen B-100
recently, but I did get to audition it a few years back and found it articulate and
emotionally very satisfying. It, like the MF gear, would do very nicely indeed with
your Dynaudios.
As to the matter of preference, you're on your own.
January 4, 2003
Subject: Polk and Epos
Wes,
I have recently read your reviews on both the Epos M15 and
the Polk LSi15. (Apparently I am interested in speakers that have 15 in their
name). You have raved over the Epos, and it sounds like you have as much admiration of the
Polk speakers as you did for the Epos.
I was wondering if you would be willing to give us a
synopsis of how you would compare those specific speakers to one another, just briefly in
terms of their relative strengths and weaknesses in comparison and whether there is a
clear "winner" for you? Thank you very much.
Gregg Gorzelle
The Epos M15 is a very special speaker, probably best
suited for a smallish room and paired with an 30 to 75Wpc amplifier. It is compact, too,
which helps a lot in those "smallish rooms." The Polks do better at the
frequency extremes and require a bit more control -- you could play them with less, but
100Wpc can really make 'em sing. And they're quite large (not either a plus or a
minus, but definitely something to take into consideration).
The Polks are obviously a lot of speaker for the money -- a
lot of technology, a lot of drivers, a lot of cabinet. In comparison, the Epos almost make
virtues out of what they don't have --"no" crossover, just two drivers,
and a light-weight cabinet. But they were such a joy to review and gave me such pleasure,
seeming to deliver great musical insights with ease, that I hold them in an especially
high regard.
|