SOUNDSTAGE! ON HIFIFeatures Archives

April 15, 2002

 

Call it The Stereophile Show

An open letter to Primedia:

My name is Wes Phillips and I write for onhifi.com and onhometheater.com and I'm a Senior Editor at the SoundStage! Network, as well as a long-time audio journalist who has written for a wide range of magazines and newspapers over the years, including a few Primedia titles. As an active freelancer, I even write the occasional Stereophile and Stereophile Guide to Home Theater feature. But I'm not writing today as a pundit, competitor, or even some-time employee. I'm writing as a passionate member of the two-channel community.

I'm a Stereophile subscriber, of course -- most serious audiophiles are. My first issue was Larry Archibald's debut as publisher in 1982. That means I've only read Stereophile for about 20 years, which makes me a relative newcomer -- I know audiophiles who've been reading it at least a decade longer.

Primedia is in the magazine business, so I don't have to mention how rare that kind of devotion is. Oh I know there are dentist's offices out there that have subscribed to Time since Henry Luce was running it, but there are really only a few magazines which engender that kind of long-term passion: National Geographic, The New Yorker, and, for a certain kind of forever-young male, Playboy. In magazine circles, that's blue-chip territory.

So why squander that loyalty and prestige by calling America's annual hi-fi show something as blandly generic as Home Entertainment 2002, The Hi-Fi and Home-Theater Event?

I realize that some Faith Popcorn-type expert on trends was probably paid good money for predicting that home theater or convergence -- or both -- represented the future. That would make anything with the word "stereo" in it automatically old-fashioned, even the title Stereophile. But that fails to recognize the difference between a trend and a passion: The future may belong to convergence, but the people who care enough about consumer electronics to attend shows are into hi-fi.

I just came back from Montreal's Festival Son et Image, a stunningly successful hi-fi show that unabashedly promoted listening to two-channel music. Yeah, I know it has the word Image in it, but that's the name of the sponsoring magazine (that's brand reinforcement -- some people consider it good synergy). And yes, there were exhibits dedicated to video and surround sound there, too. But the show's draw was two-channel audio, and the rooms that demonstrated high-quality two-channel sound were packed all weekend long.

Ask the Stereophile ad reps about it. They attended the Festival looking for participants for HE 2002.

So, call it The Stereophile Show -- everybody who attends calls it that anyway.

And make it a Stereophile show. If the goal is to put on a successful show, you have to follow through on the expectations that name implies -- expectations people already hold and that HE 2002 only serves to confound.

I attended the 2001 show and despite its unfortunate timing (Mother's Day weekend) and logistical nightmares (Clinton's security detail essentially closed down the premises for three hours on Saturday), it was thronged with enthusiastic audiophiles -- possibly the best turnout since the 1996 Waldorf-Astoria show.

But the problem is, all those people came to what they still call -- what still is, as far as they're concerned -- The Stereophile Show. And they were disappointed at the way that two-channel hi-fi was marginalized. Don't get me wrong, it was a good show, but by trying to be too many things, it diluted the very thing the crowds had come to participate in.

And the HE 2001 name not only confused some of your staunchest supporters, it probably convinced others to downplay the event. My parent company, the SoundStage! Network, faced with tough choices about how to assign limited resources, didn't even attend HE 2001. It perceived that Frankfurt's unrepentantly two-channel High End 2001 was more in line with its readers' interests. I covered HE 2001 on my site, but I understood why the SoundStage! Network didn't.

I know Primedia inherited the name Home Entertainment 2002, The Hi-Fi and Home Theater Event. Stereophile itself renamed the show HI-FI 92 ten years ago, and the name changed again two years ago. Now, Primedia has the opportunity to eliminate confusion that keeps a valuable resource from achieving its potential by sharpening the show's focus and rightly establishing it as the premier audio event in America. Primedia stands to attract more attendees, play to the show's true strengths, and make more money in a single blow.

In Stereophile Primedia has a name to conjure with. For almost 40 years the magazine has inspired passion in audio hobbyists, and it has grown in popularity in flush times and recession alike. Its readers are passionate about music, they're devoted to the magazine, and they represent a demographic as desirable -- or more so -- as that of any magazine in the company's huge stable of publications. Why not exploit that synergy?

Unleash the power of the Stereophile name and cater to the people who love music and support it. They'd come to a Stereophile show, but they probably haven't got a clue about what goes on at a Home Entertainment Event. Sure, they came last year, but many of them felt cheated when it wasn't what they expected.

I'm not saying you should ignore multichannel or home theater. Both categories helped energize the electronics industry -- that's obvious. But home-theater fans, for instance, don't tend to participate in their hobby in the same focused, not to say obsessive, manner as audiophiles. Most people, having purchased a home-theater system, sit back and enjoy it. Their participation in the hobby from then on primarily hinges around actually watching movies.

They don't relentlessly pursue increasingly better systems with ever-increasing accuracy, the way audiophiles do. They don't haunt the electronics stores in search of better and better upgrades. They don't (gasp) subscribe year after year to specialty magazines.

People will certainly come to the show to see what's new in home theater -- a lot of people will experience real home theater for the first time at the show. That's good. People come to these things to see the latest fads and they love having a chance to see (and hear) fantasy systems. The big electronics companies know that, and they'll rent the big rooms, and they'll do a land-office business in them.

But shows -- and magazines -- don't survive and thrive off the big rooms alone. They're a draw and generate lots of revenue, but people tend to discover Sony and Pioneer and Polk products without all that much help from the magazine industry. It's all the little companies renting the rooms on the upper floors that keep the hobby alive and keep people reading the magazines.

One of the most wonderful things about the audio industry is that it is still populated by passionate people -- frequently by people whose passion overwhelms their common sense. You still get products that defy reason. Twenty years ago, one of those products was a hulking power amplifier that put out only 50Wpc and was named after a race of aliens featured in a 1950s sci-fi movie. People responded to that irrational product unreasonably -- they loved it. They bought it despite its staggering price and unwieldy size and insanely low output -- and today Krell is one of the cornerstones of the specialty audio industry.

People come to these shows precisely to fall in love with quirky little companies that are still making products that defy reason. That's the fun. I recently went to the Mall of America and it was intensely boring -- there wasn't a funky, passionate store in the whole complex, just acre after acre of every store you've ever seen in a shopping mall, all under one roof.

Nobody would dream of paying $35 to wander around the Mall of America for three days. But get Conrad-Johnson, Audio Research, Krell, Wilson Audio Specialties, and MartinLogan under one roof and you'd better step out of the path to the door -- you could get trampled by the stampede.

When people tell you that two-channel audio is dead and that you've got to look at the future, they're ignoring the fact that listening to music isn't about logic -- it's about passion. There's nothing logical about spending $35 to roam around a hotel for three days. The only people who will do that are irrational music lovers and hi-fi nuts. Why not ensure that they know what you're doing for those three days? Call the show by its true name and harness the power of Stereophile's glorious 40 year history.

Call it The Stereophile Show.

...Wes Phillips
wes@onhifi.com


SOUNDSTAGE! ON HIFIAll Contents Copyright © 2002
Schneider Publishing Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Any reproduction of content on
this site without permission is strictly forbidden.